Can a Freight Broker Be Sued After an 18-Wheeler Accident in Alabama?
Yes, in many cases. Since a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision in May 2026, a freight broker that hires an unsafe trucking company can face a negligence claim under state law when that company’s truck causes a wreck. That puts one more possible defendant on the table alongside the driver and the trucking company. The injured person still has to prove the broker was careless in choosing the carrier, so a claim against a broker isn’t automatic.
J. David Greene of Greene & Phillips Injury Lawyers joined WKRG News 5’s Judge Knows to talk about 18-wheeler accidents on Alabama roads, who can be held responsible, and why the evidence in these cases has to be secured quickly. He described the Supreme Court’s ruling as pro-plaintiff, meaning it favors people who’ve been injured, and said the firm followed the case closely while it was pending.
Who Can Be Held Responsible After an 18-Wheeler Accident?
Often more than one party. David pointed to the driver, the trucking company the driver works for, and in some cases the company whose load the truck was hauling. Each of those parties may have its own insurance, and each may have made its own mistakes.
A trucking company can be responsible for a driver’s actions on the job. It can also be responsible for its own decisions, like putting an unqualified driver behind the wheel, pushing schedules that break federal hours-of-service limits, or skipping maintenance. Depending on how a crash happened, a company that loaded the cargo or a company that repaired the truck could share fault too.
Freight brokers are a different piece of the picture. A broker doesn’t own the truck or employ the driver. It’s the middleman that matches a shipment with a trucking company willing to haul it. For years, brokers argued that federal law shielded them from injury lawsuits over which carrier they picked. That argument is what the Supreme Court took up.
We went over the basics of why truck cases differ from car wrecks in an earlier Studio 10 segment, including the weight difference and the federal rules commercial drivers have to follow.
What Did the Supreme Court Decide About Freight Brokers?
The Supreme Court held 9-0 that federal law doesn’t block state negligence claims against a freight broker that hires an unsafe trucking company. The case is Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, decided May 14, 2026.
Shawn Montgomery, a truck driver, was severely injured when a Caribe Transport tractor-trailer veered off an Illinois highway and struck his stopped rig. The freight broker C.H. Robinson had arranged the shipment. Montgomery’s lawsuit said the broker knew, or should have known, that federal regulators had given Caribe a “conditional” safety rating that flagged problems with driver qualification, hours of service, and crash rates.
The broker argued that a federal statute, the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (often called the FAAAA), blocked that kind of state-law claim. The FAAAA generally keeps states from regulating the services brokers and carriers provide, but it has an exception for state safety rules involving motor vehicles.
All nine justices agreed that negligent hiring claims against brokers fall within that safety exception. Justice Amy Coney Barrett <!– TODO: verify authoring justice against the slip opinion –> wrote the opinion, reasoning that requiring a broker to use ordinary care when it picks a carrier is about the trucks that end up on the road. The result is that a broker can be sued under state negligence law for choosing an unsafe trucking company. You can read the full opinion on the Supreme Court’s website.
Why Does the Ruling Matter in Alabama?
It removed the rule that had been getting broker claims dismissed in Alabama’s federal courts. Alabama sits in the federal Eleventh Circuit, along with Georgia and Florida. In 2023, the Eleventh Circuit ruled in Aspen American Insurance Co. v. Landstar Ranger, Inc. that negligent-selection claims against brokers were preempted by federal law. Federal courts in Alabama were bound by that decision, and brokers relied on it to get claims dismissed early.
Montgomery overturned that rule. In June 2026, the Eleventh Circuit acknowledged that Aspen had been abrogated and vacated a lower court decision that had relied on it. So a broker claim arising from an Alabama truck crash can now move forward on its merits instead of being thrown out on preemption grounds.
David said Greene & Phillips had trucking cases affected by the ruling. For someone hurt by a commercial truck, it can mean an additional insurance policy and an additional company that has to answer for its decisions.
Does the Ruling Mean the Broker Is Always Liable?
No. The Supreme Court decided a threshold question about federal preemption. It didn’t decide that brokers are responsible for every crash involving a truck they booked. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote separately that the decision shouldn’t be read to mean brokers will routinely face liability after truck accidents.
To hold a broker responsible, an injured person generally has to show two things. First, that the broker didn’t use reasonable care in selecting the carrier. Second, that the poor selection actually contributed to the crash and the injuries. The evidence for that usually includes the carrier’s federal safety rating, its inspection and crash history, and what the broker checked (or didn’t check) before handing over the load.
That paper trail sits with the broker and the carrier. It isn’t something an injured driver can pull up on their own.
What Evidence Matters Most in an 18-Wheeler Accident Case?
The most important evidence usually comes from the truck and the trucking company: driver logs, the truck’s speed and braking data, and video. “There’s just so many different moving parts to an accident like this,” David said. Loaded tractor-trailers can legally weigh up to 80,000 pounds, and the federal rules that govern them create records a typical car wreck doesn’t.
The evidence David described on air includes:
- driver logs showing hours behind the wheel, which today are usually kept on electronic logging devices,
- data downloaded from the truck itself, such as speed, braking, and stopping distance,
- video from dash cameras, nearby businesses, or other drivers, and
- findings from accident reconstructionists the firm can bring in to work out how the crash happened.
In a case involving a broker, the carrier selection records get added to that list.
How Soon Should I Talk to a Lawyer After a Truck Accident?
As soon as you’re able. David explained that evidence at the scene disappears every time it rains or traffic runs over the area, and truck data can be overwritten if nobody asks to preserve it. A lawyer can send letters demanding that the trucking company and broker keep their records, and can get people out to the scene while it still shows what happened.
There’s a legal deadline too. Most personal injury and wrongful death claims in Alabama have to be filed within two years, though some situations carry different deadlines. In truck cases, the evidence problem usually shows up long before the filing deadline does.
David was clear that the call doesn’t have to go to his firm. “Doesn’t have to be us, but we would encourage you to talk to us,” he said. What matters is getting a lawyer who handles trucking cases involved before the trucking company’s insurer has weeks to build its version of events. If an adjuster calls first, read our guide on giving a statement to the other driver’s insurance company before you say anything. You can also learn more about how we handle truck accident cases.
The consultation is free. Greene & Phillips handles personal injury cases on a contingency fee. If there’s no recovery, you owe no attorney’s fee and no case expenses. If the firm does recover compensation for you, the fee and case expenses are paid out of that recovery.
Call Greene & Phillips Injury Lawyers at 251-478-1115 (Mobile) or 205-918-7800 (Birmingham), no appointment needed. You can also reach us through our contact page


